How solid is the science that global warming will do more harm than good? Are we relying on the “unnatural = bad” fallacy and unproven climate modeling?

Disruptive changes challenge all disrupted species; most of them flounder or go extinct.

We are not relying on a fallacy, and announcing that “unnatural = bad” is one doesn’t beg for proof, it grovels.

As to climate modeling, its challenges are in the weeds; it just isn’t perfect. But in large, it is spot on. Offering off-hand insult to the folks who have spent careers shaping and refining climate models is beneath any respectable human being.