What are the strongest arguments on either side of the debate over whether the Resurrection is meant to be taken literally?

The Pharisees did believe in life after death. When Paul had to appear in the Temple to answer charges the priests brought against him, he tossed in the question of life after death. This got the Pharisees on his side, which derailed their proceeding.

Each Gospel describes Jesus predicting his return from the dead – so odd a claim that no disciple understood it until after the fact. Subsequent lore details the remaining eleven apostles’ appalling deaths; only John survived to old age, and he died in captivity with no company other than Roman guards. No disciple considered recanting his story.

Paul Kalman’s answer points out that Jesus’ statement, “GOD is a GOD of the living not of the dead,” reinforces the idea of souls surviving bodily death.

A few days before His crucifixion Jesus told the high priests that Abraham had seen Jesus’s coming and was glad, and further that “Before Abraham was, I AM.”

To argue against the literal resurrection requires one to deny the entire Christian Scripture and its teachings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s